Arizona Hoof Rehab

AZ
ph: 602-791-0840

Navicular Pain

 
 Below you will find two articles written on Navicular Syndrome. One is the result of work done by Dr. Robert Bowker and the other is by Dr. Tomas Teskey. Times are changing. We are making great strides in finding better methods to treat horses suffering from pain. Technology is making it possible for us to search deeper, go further, and develop faster than ever before. I hope these articles are as enlightening to you as they were to me. 
 



 

Physiological Trimming for a

Healthy Equine Foot 

More than ten years of intensive, scientific research at Michigan State University has resulted in new recommendations that are leading to relief from navicular syndrome and other chronic foot ailments in the horse.

Robert Bowker, VMD, PhD, director of the Equine Foot Laboratory at the College of Veterinary Medicine at Michigan State University is conducting this research on the physiological function of the equine foot.

Bowker earned his veterinary degree at the University of Pennsylvania's College of Veterinary Medicine in 1973 and later began additional PhD research in the anatomy department at the medical school there. He completed the PhD degree in 1979 and began his career at MSU in 1988.

As a result of teaching gross anatomy to MSU veterinary students, Bowker became interested in the equine foot, because he knew that the texts commonly used by students and veterinarians were often incorrect on this subject.

As his PhD training was in neurobiology, Bowker began to look at the nerves of the foot, and the research expanded from there to blood vessels, cartilage, and bones of the foot, and more recently to hooves and their laminae in both health and disease.

Most of his research efforts are supported by the American Quarter Horse
Association, the Grayson-Jockey Club Research Foundation, Inc., and private
donations.

In the 1990s, Bowker began supplementing his scientific studies with observations in the field. He studied the foot of the wild horse in order to better understand the situation of the domestic horse.

Bowker's research in all these areas led to the discovery of a wholly different
theory of how horse feet respond to ground impact. His research focused on the
blood flow to and from the equine foot and the role it plays in energy dissipation.

The results of his research led Bowker to believe that the modern-day horse should be trimmed so that more of the back part of the foot--including the frog--will bear the initial ground impact forces and weight.

His research showed that if the foot was trimmed so that the frog rests on the
ground, the back part of the foot would be stimulated to grow more fibrous and
fibrocartilaginous tissue in the digital cushion, which appears to be protective
of the more chronic foot problems.

The Physiological Trim

Bowker has studied the various components (the frog, sole, blood flow, etc.) of
the equine foot and has determined the role they play together to make a "good"
equine foot.

According to Bowker, "The aim is to use this acquired knowledge to prevent and better treat cases of navicular syndrome and other chronic foot ailments."

Bowker and his students at the Equine Foot Laboratory, in close collaboration with other farriers and veterinarians, have developed guidelines for a "physiological trim." While some aspects of the trim are not new, they have been forgotten or have been underutilized by most hoofcare professionals.

Bowker explains, "The physiological trim is a trim that permits the tissues of the
foot to function optimally in dissipating impact energies during foot contact with
the ground."

According to him, "This physiological trim is the result of the continuous
evolution of our research. We've found that the back part of the foot and blood
flow is a major mechanism for dissipating energy.

"Our research has shown that the equine foot is constantly adapting and responding to environmental conditions. Most feet are sculpted by their environment, rather than only by genetic influences.

"We have found that from a neuro-anatomical point of view, the equine foot is
designed to hit the ground heel-first. This concept of hitting the ground
heel-first is seen in virtually all feral horses and the majority of sound
domestic horses.

"We have also determined that the back part of the foot should be the largest
surface, area wise, for ground impact." Bowker explains, "This is very much like
a human being wearing high-heeled shoes as opposed to sneakers. The more
comfortable sneakers distribute the load over a larger surface area, versus the
smaller area of a high-heeled shoe." An impact load distributed over a large
surface area can be better supported with minimal stress by the foot tissues.

Bowker further explains that the horse has the additional energy dissipation
mechanisms of the large blood flow through this same region. Together this large
surface area--coupled with the frog and the blood flow--is what dissipates the energy.

When the back part of the foot and frog do not touch the ground, this impact
energy is not dissipated but instead is transmitted to the bones and other tissues
of the foot. These tissues do not dissipate the impact energy well. The
long-term result of insufficient energy dissipation is chronic foot problems and
lameness. For example, in underrun feet, the ground contact area is usually under
the coffin bone rather than under the back part of the foot.

Recommendations for Farriers

"What we are trying to do is work with Mother Nature, not fight her," explains
Bowker. "We can do this by keeping the toe short and the back part of the foot on the ground. In other words, it's a matter of using a large dose of common sense."

The aim is to have a functional, physiologically sound foot. The way to achieve
this involves three essential ingredients: the frog, the sole, and the trim.

Frog on the Ground

Bowker's research has shown that the frog must be on the ground. He emphasizes that in order to get the frog resting on the ground, the farrier must gradually lower the heel. When the heel is not on the ground, the foot will start to
contract and get smaller, similar to a woman wearing "high heeled" shoes.

According to Bowker, "Once the frog is on the ground, the bars will contribute in supporting weight and much of the load will be supported by the sole."

This load is transmitted to the sole around the frog apex via the dirt that
accumulates from the ground. "Dirt should be left in the foot," explains Bowker.
In other words, don't clean your horse's feet unless they have been standing in a
lot of manure.

Bowker further states that a foot that has a high-cupped or dished-out sole and
frog that is not on the ground will not be able to support its weight with the
frog and solar surface. This goes back to the analogy mentioned earlier about
high heels and a small surface area for weight bearing. This small surface area
results in high loads being placed upon the foot and will result in significant
stress changes to the foot tissues.

"In a nutshell, what we want when the farrier is finished trimming the equine foot
is that when viewing the solar surface of the foot, one-third of the foot will be
in front of the apex of the frog, and two-thirds behind it. This creates a short
toe and encourages a 'heel first' landing."

Gradually Lower the Heel

Bowker emphasizes that any changes to a horse's feet should be done gradually. He explains that, "If the frog is on the ground, the foot will do what Mother Nature intends it to do. When the frog is on the ground, the heel will be low (not an under run heel)--this is what the farrier should aim for.

"But if the frog is not on the ground, the heel should be lowered gradually over a
period of several weeks. This is important, as it will allow the foot to adjust
to the changes. Again, this is a matter of common sense: do these adjustments
gradually, as opposed to all at once, as the foot will better adapt to these
changes."

Bowker explains that a good way to check to see if the frog is touching the ground is to try to insert a thin plastic ruler under the frog at the rear of the foot
while the horse is standing on cement or asphalt. He states that, "If the frog is
on the ground, you shouldn't be able to slide the ruler under the frog. If you
can, it means that the frog is not bearing a lot of weight, which is contrary to
what it was designed to do."

Bowker emphasizes, "The farrier should not trim much, if any, of the
frog--especially the cushion --the swollen area that is four to five centimeters
(one and one-half to two inches) behind the apex of the frog. Farriers tend to
remove this by trimming straight back and removing it. This cushion area, as well
as the rest of the frog, should not be trimmed."

According to Bowker, "The farrier, when looking at the solar surface of the foot,
should not trim and remove much of the frog, as the goal is to trim the foot so
that the frog is resting on the ground."

Bowker's observations of the trimming methods used on today's horses are that in most cases you can slide not only a ruler but your fingers and even part of your hand under the frog.

The Sole

According to Bowker, "The farrier's goal should be to trim the foot to increase
the surface area of the weight-bearing surface of the solar part of the foot.

"When the farrier is trimming, he/she should try to get to the sole plane (the
grayish, waxy part of the sole that will appear after the dry, scaly superficial
part of the sole has been flaked off). This should be done on the edge of the
sole by the quarters of the hoof wall."

The result: this reveals the plane of the live sole in relationship to the rest of
the foot.

Once this has been established in the foot, then in the future, the farrier need
not have to remove sole or frog. The farrier's goal should be to leave as much of
the sole as possible.

Bowker states, "In the feral horse, the sole thickness is twice as thick as that
of the domestic horse, which is why the feral horse can run and walk over most all surfaces without any tenderness."

Don't Touch the Sole!

Bowker explains, "Once the farrier has established the sole plane (the live sole
remains constant to the rest of the foot), he/she may not have to remove much sole at all in future trimming.

"The goal in future trimming is to leave as much sole as possible. Therefore,
once the farrier is satisfied with the sole plane and coffin bone alignment,
he/she shouldn't have to touch the sole or the frog very much, if at all."

Often there is a tendency to remove much sole creating a high arch. While this
lessens the chance of the horse landing on small rocks and therefore having tender feet, it encourages significant stress in the coffin bone.

But, in a "bad-footed" horse (a horse with chronic lameness), the farrier will
have to get to the sole plane, and then he/she can trim the sole in relationship
to that sole plane. That will level the plane of the sole in relationship to the
plane of the coffin bone.

Bowker believes that the foot should be trimmed regularly and often to keep the
toe short--at five- to six-week intervals rather than the eight to ten weeks that
is commonly used by horse owners.

Again Bowker states that this is a matter of common sense--to maintain the foot in as perfect condition as you can by trimming more frequently, rather than trimming at very long intervals (eight to ten weeks).

Don't Touch the Bars, Either

Bowker also emphasizes that the bars of the foot should not be removed. "They are there for a reason! Leave the bars so they are a little bit lower (shorter) than
the hoof wall--with 'a little bit' meaning a fraction of a millimeter. But
obviously, if the bars have overgrown the horn, they need to be trimmed, but not
removed--again this is a matter of common sense."

Trimming for 1/3-2/3

Keep in mind that one of the goals of the "physiological trim" is that one-third
of the foot should be in front of the apex of the frog and two-thirds should be
behind it.

According to Bowker, "If you have a foot where one-half to two-thirds of the foot are in front of the apex of the frog, you now have a foot in which the sole and foot relationships are out of balance (i.e. the toe is much too long)."

He explains, "You can trim the foot back to approach this one-third to two-thirds ratio. The farrier, in consultation with a veterinarian, may request radiographs to discover where the coffin bone is in relationship to the hoof wall if this one-third/two-thirds ratio is out of alignment. Lateral radiographs, marking the apex of the frog with a thumbtack and a wire on the dorsal hoof wall, will
demonstrate the relationship of the coffin bone to these external foot structures.

Once you demonstrate where the tip of the coffin bone and frog apex are, you can generally measure 1-1/4 - 1-1/2 inches in front of the apex of the frog to locate where the new toe will be. In horses with long toes, the farrier will be trimming behind the white line.

Bowker adds, "Once you are confident where these internal structures are in
relationship to the hoof and sole, the farrier can prepare the foot to this
one-third/two-thirds trim. (Once the farrier becomes aware and experienced with the sole callus and other sole features, radiographs may not always be necessary). Then it is okay to trim the toe area by rounding it off. Again, another common sense note is that if you are unsure where internal structures are located, consult with a veterinarian to obtain radiographs."

Shoes

To shoe or not to shoe, that is often the question. Bowker explains, "If the
horse must have shoes on, the problem results in the frog being elevated from the
ground. Therefore, it isn't touching the ground and doing its job of bearing
weight. Physiological function of the foot is compromised and the foot begins to
contract.

"Some farriers have started trimming the foot so the frog is as close to the
ground as possible--and even touching the ground--when the horse has shoes on. Therefore, if the horse has to have shoes on, this is the next best option."

What about barefooted horses with tender feet? Bowker explains, "It is simply a
matter of 'whatever you ride the horse on is what you should bed the horse on.'
The foot will adapt to whatever environmental surface the horse is standing on.
The problem arises when we bed them on soft surfaces (straw, shavings, rubber
mats, etc.) and then expect them to walk/trot/gallop on rocks.

"There are hundreds of barefoot endurance horses that are housed and trained on hard-packed surfaces (hard dirt, gravel, small rocks, etc.) without tender feet.
The environment is the major determinant of a healthy foot rather than genetics.
Again, it is a matter of common sense, as the foot will adapt to its environment.
However, I do not recommend that horses be kept on cement."

How to Gradually Turn a Bad Foot Into a Good Foot

Bowker recommends the farrier use these trimming techniques conservatively to
gradually turn a bad foot into a good foot and allow the foot time to adjust.

"We do know that such a physiological trim as described here and greater
movement--rather than stall rest--are critically important to producing a good
foot, regardless of the breed of horse."

For example, over the past year, Bowker has received dozens of letters and emails from owners and veterinarians asking about their horses' prognosis with navicular syndrome. Most of these horses have been through all sorts of pads/bar shoes, acupuncture, and pain management therapy, with little or no improvement.

However, with using this "physiological trim" (removal of the shoes and lowering
the heels to get the frog on the ground), the horse owners and veterinarians have
communicated back to Bowker that the feet responded and began to become sound within a short time period (six to eight weeks).

For additional information on Bowker's research, see New Theory May Help Avoid Navicular and A New Theory About Equine Foot Physiology, at
http://cvm.msu.edu/HINFO.HTM

NOTE: This article is property of Robert Bowker, VMD, PhD.


 

Treating Navicular Syndrome
Avoiding the Damaging Effects of Neurectomies & Surgical Procedures
Tomas G. Teskey DVM

Dr. Teskey asks that any vets who would like to discuss his article please email him on
tomasteskey@yahoo.com

Many of the veterinary procedures that are offered to horse owners have changed little over the years except that now they are supported with more powerful drugs and better medical imaging. Even with this greater knowledge of living tissue we still we seem to be stuck in the dark ages with hoof care. Young vets are still being taught procedures that are based on prolonging usefulness, based on the premise that these navicular horses are incurable………. and so these procedures continue to be recommended to their clients. Barefoot trimming is at the present in a situation where those working at the coal face are healing horses daily but it will take a while for the “science” of it to catch up. Please
offer this article to anyone who is thinking of using the “traditional” treatment for a navicular horse. Below is an email from Dr. Tom Teskey to a new client of his which makes clear just how invasive and destructive these procedures are…………………….and how unnecessary they are!


“I was recently approached about consulting with a dressage stable owner re his plans to purchase an eight year old Swedish Warmblood mare that had been diagnosed with navicular syndrome. He was interested in just using her as a brood mare since she was approaching middle age and the lameness problem was “incurable”.
I was informed that her fantastic breeding and records in the show ring would likely make her foals highly desirable. The previous owner was selling the mare because she was unable to afford the "necessary" surgery that the mare needed to remain sound and usable. Her veterinarian was planning on performing a digital neurectomy on both the front lower legs of the mare and had been in touch with the new owner about following through with this “necessary” procedure. The stable owner decided to purchase the mare at a greatly reduced price and has been in consultation with me since the time the mare stepped foot on his property. This was six and a half months ago. He has also been in contact with the referring veterinarian over this time and has kept her informed of our progress in treating this mare.


One of his original questions for me before I met him or this mare “Crystal” was as follows: He writes in his email; “I'm hoping you can help me out. I've just purchased a broodmare with navicular. Would it be possible for you to provide me with some information before breeding this mare? I've looked at the x-rays with the previous vet and she is suggesting cutting the nerve on this mare and didn't understand why the previous owner hadn't done it sooner. Thank you for your time.”


My response to him four months ago was as follows and with his permission I am sharing this information with any and all of you who would like to explore with me what has traditionally been happening with these horses and why it is high time we re-evaluate the way we think about and treat these very common hoof problems. The procedure you are referring to is known as a “Neurectomy”. It is generally performed on horses that
have had chronic pain problems in their feet, most notably “navicular” problems. The horse is put under general anesthesia and the digital nerve on both sides of the lame leg AND THE MORE SOUND LEG are isolated and cut ……… most often a section of the nerve on both sides is removed and the ends “capped “with the left over nerve sheath.


The reason that both legs are surgicated is because most horses end up quite lame in the leg opposite the originally lame one if it is left intact! Thus one can easily appreciate that even though a horse only shows lameness in one of the forelegs, both are affected in a horse with “navicular” disease or “navicular syndrome”. The result of the surgery is that the horse looses sensation from the severed point downwards and is unable to feel the pain from the diseased foot anymore. Usually limping is due to pain in the area so the limping goes away and the horse can continue to be used. The horse was thus
returned to what is quaintly called “soundness”.


This procedure costs anywhere from $250 to $1,500 (US) depending on where it is done and who does it. It is effective for around one or two years ………………… sometimes not that long, sometimes longer, but all of these horses eventually regrow some nerve connections and regain sensation of the area that was originally desensitized. The lameness then returns and the procedure can be repeated at that time to keep the horse “sound”.


As you can easily see the procedure addressed only one thing for the horse and the owner: the head bobbing visible lameness. There are some very real and potentially devastating negative side effects of digital neurectomies in horses. Often times the raw ends of the nerves become irritated to the point of developing extremely
painful nerve tumors called neuromas, leading to further surgeries to remove them. Other times, the digital arteries and veins that lie immediately parallel to the cut digital nerves become scarred and the resulting stagnation of circulation leads to foundering of the worst degree. Localized infections, scarring and tendinous and ligmentous structures and unsightly swellings are also common. Thus, a procedure designed to provide temporary relief from a widely misunderstood type of lameness often leads to further pain, loss of use and early death for these affected horses.


Performing these surgeries is severely disruptive to the horse's lower leg anatomy, physiology and energy patterns, and commonly leads to irreparable damage.
“Navicular problems”, often referred to as “heel pain” or “caudal heel syndrome” start presenting symptoms in horses as young as two and three years old when their hooves are either allowed to overgrow in a deformed shape and/or their feet are shod at this young age. The still developing coffin bones and sensitive inner hoof structures are surrounded, constricted and pressurized by the progressively deforming hoof capsules, starving them of vital movement and circulation, yet forcing them to function and survive in a physiologically stagnant state.


Older horses are also plagued by what is termed “navicular disease” and innumerable other hoof problems when their hooves also succumb to deformities in structure and stagnation of function. These lamenesses occur after long periods of what was traditionally thought of as “the best hoof care available”. When this “best” hoof care consisted of ill frequent trimming and/or shoeing, it is no mystery…….. but rather a highly predictable physiological certainty ……………that these horses will suffer
from hoof deformities and possibly debilitating lamenesses. Killing me softly takes on a whole new meaning when it comes to the effects of the steel horse shoe on our equine companions”.


Given that all these navicular horses can be shown to have visible deformities in the outward appearance of their hooves, it would seem logical to direct our efforts towards improving their abnormal hoof form and reversing the trends that are causing the deformities and providing the horse a situation that promotes good hoof form.
Cutting the digital nerves in these horses provides absolutely nothing that is honestly
therapeutic for them! It is a medically unsound procedure, but it is prevalent in our modern day “use and abuse” philosophy of keeping horses going ………….doing this in a day and age where we now have an excellent understanding of why these horses end up with “navicular” pain is totally unnecessary and irresponsible…………….there is no sound medical reason to perform these nerve surgeries with the reckless abandon that we do. These procedures are an excellent example of how simple ignorance of proper hoof form and function allows horse owners and their veterinarians to perform them.


Terms like “salvage procedure” have become widely used to describe such procedures that prolong the useful life of an animal strictly for the human's monetary benefit. Addressing the real problems of the deformities in the feet and how to reverse them with proper trimming and lifestyle win out as the only acceptable alternative for these animals and their human stewards, and the true salvage in terms of the lives of horses will then be realized. Performing digital neurectomies on heel sore, or foot sore horses promotes further degeneration of the entire lower leg and hooves in these animals, because it disrespects and disallows what the entire animal needs to achieve a more proper hoof form and normal function. Instead of cutting the nerves to a part of the horse's anatomy and achieving a completely false sense of “soundness”, we are alternatively able to
nurture these unsound horses and their deformed feet to attain correct hoof form and thus proper and vital physiologic function and a pain free state.


Natural exfoliation, vital mechanical hoof movements, energizing sensation and exquisite protection are just a few of the important functions horses' hooves need to have, and this is precisely what they achieve with proper hoof care. This leads us and our horses on a direct path to honest soundness, far outpacing conventional western veterinary medical techniques and promoting the physical and physiological health of the entire horse rather than disrupting part of the horse's vital anatomy, which only leads to deterioration and loss of use and early death.


As it is the improperly trimmed and/or shod horses that are the ones being affected by “navicular syndrome”, we know that promoting sound, naturally shaped hooves along with adequate movement on firm terrain is essentially a life–promoting and life-saving, honestly therapeutic form of treatment and it is this type of treatment that I will prescribe for horses that I tend to, as it is the only treatment that respects the nature of the horse.
Drugs such as isoxsuprine, nitrous oxide, nitroglycerin, phenlybutazone and flunixin meglumine do nothing to improve the deformed feet in these affected horses. Eggbar shoes, reversed shoes, special pads, natural balance shoes, wedge pads, impression material, shoes with rails and/or frog inserts or any other artificial appliance attached to the bottom of the horse cannot be honestly therapeutic for horses with navicular problems and other hoof ailments. It is a physiologic impossibility; they can only serve to
further the deformities and damage the horses to which they are nailed, perhaps prolonging the development of further, inevitable symptoms until years down the road, but still furthering the damage all the while! There is not a single case of a horse with severe “navicular disease” that has been cured with the application of an appliance to the foot.


Cured and or sound would be defined as a horse that is able to walk trot and run at liberty on their own feet in a soft environment with animation, impulsion and without lameness. It is promotion of natural hoof form and thus proper hoof function which allows horses to heal from the insults previously afforded them by improper trimming, shoeing and/or lifestyle, and they heal remarkably well if we respect their fascinating anatomy and it's wonderfully simple physiology.


Providing this option to horse owners when they are faced with whether to pay for “salvage procedures” or provide for what their horse honestly needs is what the natural hoof care movement is about. These are life and death situations and it saves horses every day. It is ironic that honest well intentioned people across the land are spending their hard earned money on treatments that are making their horses more unsound and more unusable in the long run. Terms such as “therapeutic shoeing” or “corrective shoeing” will soon be exposed for the oxymorons they are, and interested parties such as insurance companies and horse leasing operations will soon question such practices, and will not stand idly by while shelling out millions of dollars to pay for such appliances and
other “therapeutic treatments” such as neurectomies that only serve to worsen the conditions of the animals for which they are responsible.


Alas, this is the age we now live in………………….an age of transition for ourselves as well as our horses. Our responsibilities are great, the knowledge is there and it is coming to an area near you.
Tomas Teskey DVM.

P.S. “Crystal” is walking and trotting soundly (with animation and impulsion) in the last three weeks of her barefoot treatment that I have prescribed, and is working with an alertness and vitality that a few short months ago was gone from her life. She lives in a large 50 foot by 100 foot turnout on the far side of the boarding stable property with another gelding that she likes to boss around, has free choice grass hay and minerals, receives a variety of other herbs and vegetables daily and will be foregoing her
previously planned pregnancies to go back to the show ring and jumping circuit in the spring.

The previous owner and the veterinarian have so

far been uninterested in visiting her in her new
setting with her new lifestyle, but twenty other
boarders are keenly aware of where this crippled
mare was four months ago and where she is
headed now……these are the people that have
been keeping the previous owner, veterinarian
and two farriers updated on Crystal's progress. I
will now be turning over the hoof trimming
duties to her new owner, as he has been an
excellent student of the hoof under my
supervision and has demonstrated a willingness
and good ability to groom her much improved
hooves. There are also several other boarders
that will continue their hoof grooming classes
with me and be taking care of their horses' feet
very soon. He and Crystal will be showing
regionally starting in March.
Tom Teskey with his barefoot horses.

 

 

 According to the veterinary medical teaching hospital, University of Wisconsin-Madison, lameness is the number one reason that a horse's  potential is never realized.  At the University of Wisconsin, they use nuclear scintigraphy to noninvasively locate deep sites of skeletal inflammation.

Scintigraphy uses a radioisotope injected into the blood that is preferentially taken up by areas of bone inflammation; as a result, it can actually indicate metabolism in an area of bone. Scintigraphy is also valuable in the diagnosis of bone inflammation when there is no radiographic signs of abnormalities. The inflamed area shows up as an obvious area of increased radioactive uptake."

 

 Once scintigraphy had isolated the cause for the lameness,  radiographs provided more detail on the extent of the problem.

 

 

 

Copyright. All rights reserved.

Web Hosting by Yahoo!

AZ
ph: 602-791-0840